Meteorites For Sale
Meteorites & Fossils For Sale
Meteorite Mart - Meteorites For Sale
SearchingForFun - Meteorites For Sale
Mike's Astro Photos
Meteorite Art
Michael Blood Meteorites: Largest Selection of Meteorites That Hit Things
FallingRocks.com
Your Ad Here
Your Ad Here
Your Ad Here
Your Ad Here
JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER: SIMPLY TYPE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS AND CLICK SUBMIT

Meteorite Hunting In The USA

There is a debate going on in the USA right now over whether or not it’s ok to hunt meteorites on federal land anymore. Though this is not new information, it seems the increased popularity of meteorites through greater publicity and most probably a greater number of inquiries to the BLM (BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT) about meteorite hunting by potential new meteorite hunters, the BLM have recently posted a policy on their website which states that meteorites are illegal to collect on federal land. http://www.blm.gov/or/programs/minerals/noncollectables.php The current interpretation of the law excludes the public and alienates professionals who’ve been hunting and providing meteorites to both the private collectors and public institutions and museums for decades.

Right now this is big news in the meteorite world. In one camp you have purists who believe that meteorites should only be collected by authorized scientific personnel or those trained in the proper recovery of meteorites and the vital scientific data. In the other camp you have the meteorite hunters who’ve spent literally decades hunting meteorites and providing valuable meteorite data to the scientific community not to mention a large portion of all meteorites in institutional collections throughout the world were provided by the private sector by very professional and accomplished meteorite hunters. Then you have a mix of other differing opinions across the board from the rest of the meteorite world. There are scientists and meteorite hunters in both camps, and there are dividing lines between competing philosophies.

Some of those in the scientific community and the federal government would have you believe that the public has no right to collect meteorites on federal land at all, and some support the trampling of the rights of the the qualified public to hunt for meteorites on that land citing the 1906 Antiquities Act or rather an interpretation thereof.

What’s important to understand is this debate has been going on for a very long time, but it’s just now becoming more public because of the increased awareness of meteorites through television shows and media attention. 6 months ago you would have never contacted me for a quote, now journalists contact those in the meteorite world for quotes much more often.

To be fair, the scientific community has created the best resource for knowledge on meteorites ever conceived by humans, but we can never forget that that knowledge came from multiple sources, sources that include the private sector meteorite hunters as well as trained scientists. Underfunded educational institutions typically cannot afford to sponsor large expeditions to hunt meteorites throughout the world or the USA for that matter, but the private sector usually has more freedoms and funding to launch meteorite hunting expeditions throughout the USA and worldwide.

Another very important group directly related to meteorite hunting is the private collectors, museums, and universities throughout the world who’ve benefited from having access to meteorite material for study and collection. If it were not for the private sector meteorite hunting professionals there would be almost no meteorite material for the “public” to collect at all, nor would many universities and institutions have such large meteorite collections.

Every human being on the planet should have a right to collect meteorites. Meteorites potentially have within them the knowledge of everything, and everyone should be able to appreciate and wonder in that.

2 Comments

  1. Thomas says:

    This would appear to be an overly-broad interpretation of the Antiquities Act, which specifically regulates the removal from federal lands of “historic or prehistoric ruin or monument, or any object of antiquity”. Its quite clear that this phrase refers to objects created by humans, not rocks falling from the sky. Its especially hard to imagine a where a fresh fall of a meteorite could be considered an “object of antiquity”. If it wasn’t here yesterday, its not an object of antiquity!

    Even the Washington/Oregon BLM web page is rather fuzzy in its terminology, stating that “government officials consider it [meteorites] to belong to the government and, under an interpretation [of the Antiquities Act]…”

    Now, I’m no lawyer, but government officials “considering” things and “interpreting” laws doesn’t sound quite as cut and dry as the BLM want us to think. If it was a clear violation of federal law, I would expect that they would say so, and cite precedents, as well.

    I checked with the Arizona BLM page, and there was no such language. Just the standard 25 pounds per day, no commercial sale of rocks, no machinery, etc.

    Has anyone seen similar language to the Washington/Oregon site elsewhere, or heard anything more official in this regard? It would be nice to get this clarified one way of the other, before federal law enforcement types start hassling collectors on BLM land…

  2. Karen says:

    This would appear to be an overly-broad interpretation of the Antiquities Act, which specifically regulates the removal from federal lands of “historic or prehistoric ruin or monument, or any object of antiquity”. Its quite clear that this phrase refers to objects created by humans, not rocks falling from the sky. Its especially hard to imagine a where a fresh fall of a meteorite could be considered an “object of antiquity”. If it wasn’t here yesterday, its not an object of antiquity!

    Even the Washington/Oregon BLM web page is rather fuzzy in its terminology, stating that “government officials consider it [meteorites] to belong to the government and, under an interpretation [of the Antiquities Act]…”

    Now, I’m no lawyer, but government officials “considering” things and “interpreting” laws doesn’t sound quite as cut and dry as the BLM want us to think. If it was a clear violation of federal law, I would expect that they would say so, and cite precedents, as well.

    I checked with the Arizona BLM page, and there was no such language. Just the standard 25 pounds per day, no commercial sale of rocks, no machinery, etc.

    Has anyone seen similar language to the Washington/Oregon site elsewhere, or heard anything more official in this regard? It would be nice to get this clarified one way of the other, before federal law enforcement types start hassling collectors on BLM land…

Leave a Comment

Meteorites USA uses Thank Me Later